In our ongoing series on testing AI detectors, we’re diving into Smodin’s AI detection tool to see how well it identifies AI-generated text. With the increasing use of AI in content creation, the need for accurate AI detection tools has never been greater.
Finding a reliable AI detector isn’t as simple as it seems. Many tools claim to excel at spotting AI-generated content, but their actual performance often varies significantly. Some tools deliver consistent and accurate results, while others struggle with more nuanced or polished AI-written text.
Our reviews aim to cut through the noise. We test and analyze popular AI detectors, helping you determine which tools you can trust and which might need further improvement.
Smodin is a versatile tool designed to help detect if text in various languages has been generated by artificial intelligence. It’s particularly useful for analyzing content like academic assignments, marketing materials, and more.
Initially, Smodin focused on spotting plagiarism—helping ensure that written work was original and not copied from existing sources. However, as AI-generated text became more widespread with tools like ChatGPT, Smodin adapted to meet this growing need. It now offers capabilities to identify AI-created content, making it a valuable resource for educators, content creators, and businesses looking to maintain authenticity and integrity in their work.
By evolving alongside the rise of AI, Smodin has positioned itself as a go-to solution for anyone concerned about the origins of written content in our increasingly AI-driven world.
AI is transforming industries, from education to marketing, and with its rise, the demand for reliable AI detection tools has grown significantly. Smodin’s AI checker is popular because it promises clarity, accuracy, and honesty in its results, which are qualities users value when analyzing AI generated content.
For teachers, tools like Smodin play a crucial role in maintaining fairness in education. With the increasing use of AI to create essays, reports, and assignments, educators are turning to AI detection tools to ensure students’ work remains authentic and aligns with academic integrity standards.
Similar to other AI detectors, Smodin offers a straightforward process: users input the text directly into the checker, and the tool generates a score indicating the likelihood that the content was produced by AI. This simplicity, combined with its focus on multilingual capabilities, makes Smodin a go-to choice for educators, content creators, and professionals who need to verify the authenticity of written material.
To evaluate how effective Smodin’s AI detection tool is at identifying AI-generated content, we put it to the test using a variety of AI-created texts. Here’s what we did:
First, we generated three distinct types of content using ChatGPT: blog posts, research papers, and case studies. These categories were chosen because they are popular formats where AI tools are frequently employed, whether for academic purposes, professional writing, or marketing.
We then ran these AI-generated texts through Smodin’s AI detector to see how well it performed. To add a layer of comparison, we also tested the same texts using another tool called Netus AI. This allowed us to compare Smodin’s results against a competing tool to gauge its reliability and effectiveness in identifying AI-written material.
Prompt: “Write a comprehensive guide to choosing PC speakers, covering essential factors like speaker types, audio quality considerations, connectivity options, and budget-friendly recommendations. Include tips on speaker placement and optimizing the audio setup for an enhanced computing experience.“
When testing a blog post generated by ChatGPT, we found significant differences between the results from two AI detection tools: Netus AI and Smodin.
Netus AI’s AI Detector evaluated the text as being completely AI-generated, assigning it a score of 100% AI and 0% human-written. This indicates that Netus AI firmly identified the content as entirely machine-created.
In contrast, Smodin provided a strikingly different assessment. It classified the same blog post as predominantly human-written, with a score of 95.2% human and only 4.8% AI-generated.
Prompt: “Produce a comprehensive research paper exploring the intricacies of selecting PC speakers, delving into various speaker types (such as bookshelf speakers, 2.1 systems, and soundbars), considerations for optimal audio quality (including frequency response and distortion levels), connectivity options (wired vs. wireless), and budget-friendly recommendations across different price ranges. Investigate the impact of speaker placement on sound projection and clarity, along with software optimization techniques to enhance audio performance. Incorporate empirical evidence and industry insights to support recommendations and conclusions for optimizing the PC speaker selection process.“
When evaluating a research paper generated by ChatGPT, Netus AI and Smodin once again delivered very different results, raising questions about their detection methodologies.
According to Netus AI, the research paper appeared to be overwhelmingly AI-generated, with a score of 99% AI and just 1% human-written. This suggests that Netus AI strongly identified machine involvement in creating the content.
On the other hand, Smodin presented a vastly different interpretation. It classified the text as predominantly human-written, with a score of 96.6% human and only 3.4% AI-generated.
Prompt: “Develop a detailed case study examining the process of selecting PC speakers for optimal audio performance in a specific computing environment. Explore different speaker types (e.g., bookshelf speakers, 2.1 systems) and their suitability based on usage requirements (e.g., gaming, multimedia). Investigate key factors influencing speaker choice, such as audio quality metrics (frequency response, THD), connectivity options (wired vs. wireless), and budget considerations. Include real-world scenarios of speaker setup and placement, highlighting the impact on sound quality and user experience. Conclude with insights on best practices for selecting and configuring PC speakers to maximize audio satisfaction in diverse computing setups.“
When testing a case study created using ChatGPT, the results from Netus AI and Smodin could not have been more contradictory, highlighting a stark contrast in their evaluation approaches.
According to Netus AI, the case study was entirely AI-generated, with a score of 100% AI and 0% human-written. This assessment leaves no doubt that the content was identified as machine-produced.
However, Smodin reached the opposite conclusion. It rated the case study as being 100% human-written, with 0% AI-generated content detected.
Based on our initial tests, Smodin struggled to accurately identify AI-generated content. Unlike Netus AI, which correctly detected all three AI-created examples, Smodin incorrectly classified them as human-written—even though the texts were directly copied from ChatGPT.
To ensure a robust test, we provided ChatGPT with detailed, technical, and high-quality prompts to produce well-crafted content. This approach aimed to evaluate whether the tools could handle polished AI-generated writing. While Netus AI performed flawlessly, identifying every sample as AI-generated, Smodin failed to recognize the machine-generated origin of the texts.
It’s important to note that these results are based on a limited number of tests. To thoroughly assess Smodin’s capabilities, further testing with a wider variety of text types and complexity levels would be necessary. For now, the results suggest that while Netus AI is highly reliable for detecting AI-written content, Smodin may not yet be as effective in distinguishing between human and AI-created text.
Is Smodin free?
Yes, Smodin offers a free AI content detector, making it accessible for users who want to analyze text without committing to a subscription. With the free version, you can check up to 5,000 characters per scan, allowing you to test its capabilities on a decent amount of content.
This feature is ideal for students, educators, or professionals who want to explore the tool before deciding if it meets their needs. It’s a practical way to evaluate its accuracy and reliability without any upfront cost.
What is Smodin?
Smodin is a versatile AI-powered tool with a variety of features designed to make content creation and analysis easier. It offers multiple capabilities, including:
By combining these features, Smodin stands out as an all-in-one platform for writing assistance and AI detection. This makes it a useful tool for professionals, students, and creators looking for a flexible solution to their writing and detection needs.
Are AI writing tools okay to use?
Yes, AI writing tools can be perfectly fine to use—when applied ethically and transparently. These tools are especially helpful for tasks like creating content outlines, brainstorming ideas, or improving the efficiency of writing workflows.
However, over-reliance on AI-generated content without proper editing or originality can have downsides. For instance, search engines like Google prioritize high-quality, unique, and value-driven content. If your content is heavily AI-generated and lacks a human touch, it might not perform well in search rankings. In some cases, it could even harm your website’s visibility in search results.
Through digital leadership we empower people to leverage the opportunities in global economy
Through digital leadership we empower people to leverage the opportunities in global economy
@ 2024 Netus AI.
